Having spent years immersed in the vibrant world of competitive salsa dancing before transitioning to academia, I was naturally intrigued by Kristen Luker’s book, Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-Glut. My background in dance, particularly Salsa For Dancing, shaped my approach to movement, rhythm, and connection – elements I hoped to find mirrored in Luker’s perspective on social science research.
While the book wasn’t exactly the salsa dance manual for social scientists I initially envisioned, it offered a valuable and insightful exploration of research methodologies. My initial expectation, perhaps fueled by my own experiences on the dance floor and teaching salsa for dancing, was a more direct analogy between salsa techniques and research processes. I anticipated metaphors grounded in footwork, spins, and the dynamic interplay between dance partners – the core elements that make salsa for dancing so engaging and complex.
However, Luker’s approach is more nuanced. Instead of explicit dance metaphors, she masterfully elucidates the intricacies of qualitative and historical-comparative research methods. The book excels at:
- Providing Detailed Methodological Explanations: Luker meticulously breaks down complex research methods, making them accessible to readers, particularly those new to social science research.
- Linking Research Mechanics and Processes: She effectively connects the theoretical underpinnings of research with the practical steps involved in conducting it, offering a holistic understanding.
- Describing the Research Journey: Luker provides a roadmap for navigating the research process, from initial conceptualization to final analysis, offering practical guidance at every stage.
While my personal “Reviewer 2” perspective initially longed for more overt salsa for dancing analogies, I came to appreciate Luker’s subtle yet insightful interpretation of the “salsa-dancing social scientist.” It’s not about the literal dance steps, but rather about embodying the qualities of a skilled salsa dancer: agility, nimbleness, and the ability to move gracefully and effectively through complex terrains – in this case, the intricate landscape of social science research. As Luker suggests, and I concur, the essence of a “salsa-dancing social scientist” lies in the holistic and fluid approach to research, adapting and maneuvering with expertise.
Ultimately, Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences is a highly recommended resource, especially for doctoral students and researchers focusing on qualitative methodologies. Its conversational tone, combined with methodological rigor, makes it an engaging and informative read. While it may not explicitly teach you salsa for dancing, it will certainly equip you with the essential moves to confidently navigate the world of social science research. Consider it a valuable guide to read chapter by chapter, working through the exercises, to solidify your understanding of research methods.
